FAA Grounds All US-based Boeing 787 Dreamliners

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON — The FAA has ordered all US-based airlines to ground Boeing 787 Dreamliners.

The decision comes just hours after 2 Japanese airlines grounded their fleets of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, following an emergency landing by an All Nippon Airways flight.

ANA Flight 692, with 129 passengers, made an unscheduled landing at Takamatsu airport in Japan, said airline Vice President Osamu Watanabe, after a battery alarm signal activated on the plane.

Those on board reported a burning smell in the cabin. One alarm indicated smoke in a forward electrical compartment, officials said.

The ANA aircraft left Yamaguchi Ube Airport and was en route to Haneda when the incident occurred, airline spokesman Takuya Taniguchi said.

787The FAA issued a statement saying, “As a result of an in-flight, Boeing 787 battery incident earlier today in Japan, the FAA will issue an emergency airworthiness directive to address a potential battery fire risk in the 787 and require operators to temporarily cease operations.  Before further flight, operators of U.S.-registered, Boeing 787 aircraft must demonstrate to the Federal Aviation Administration that the batteries are safe.”

The FAA says it will work with the manufacturer and carriers to develop a corrective action plan to allow the U.S. 787 fleet to resume operations as quickly and safely as possible.

United Airlines is currently the only U.S. airline operating the 787, with six airplanes in service.

Dreamliner troubles dating back four months include reports of an oil leak, a fuel leak, engine cracks and a damaged cockpit window.

This follows a very difficult development history that included a series of production setbacks and other delays before the plane entered service in 2011. Fifty of the aircraft have been delivered to airlines.

The National Transportation Safety Board said it was aware of the latest incident in Japan and was gathering information.

The Federal Aviation Administration, which is responsible for air safety, launched a comprehensive examination on Friday of the Dreamliner’s design as well as its manufacture and assembly.

The FAA said it was monitoring the ANA emergency landing report.

“The incident will be included in the comprehensive review the FAA began last week of the 787 critical systems, including design, manufacture and assembly,” it said in a statement late Tuesday.

The NTSB, meanwhile, continued its investigation of a battery fire last week.

NTSB investigators are disassembling the burned battery involved in the January 7 fire aboard a Japan Airlines Boeing 787 at Logan International Airport in Boston.

This week, the NTSB released photos that showed charred parts and wire bundles.

The fire broke out in the avionics compartment of an empty Dreamliner shortly after it had arrived and passengers had disembarked.

A maintenance worker noticed smoke in the belly of the plane and called emergency crews.

The battery powers the auxiliary unit and provides electricity for ground operations. The damaged battery was removed last week and transported to a federal laboratory in Washington, according to the NTSB.

When new, the battery weighs about 63 pounds. It is approximately 19 by 13 by 10 inches.

Officials said they made digital radiographs and computer scans to document the internal condition of the battery before taking it apart.

Investigators will download any retrievable data as part of the inquiry. In addition, the airplane’s combined flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder were also sent to the NTSB for analysis.

Fire and rescue personnel used a fire retardant to contain the flames after the battery exploded.

Last week, Boeing chief engineer Mike Sinnett expressed confidence in the battery system. “I am 100% convinced the airplane is safe to fly. I fly on it all the time,” he said.

In addition to the NTSB investigation, Japanese and French aviation officials also have launched investigations.

There are more than 150 Dreamliner flights daily, according to Boeing. United Airlines, which has six 787s, debuted the nation’s first domestic Dreamliner routes in November with much fanfare.

Ray Conner, the head of Boeing’s commercial airplanes unit, said Friday that Boeing is convinced of the aircraft’s safety and that the airlines that have bought the plane are also confident in its safety.

“These planes are safe,” he said. “We welcome any opportunity to further assure people outside the industry.”

One passenger said Friday he would avoid flying on a 787 for the time being.

“I am wary of a plane model that has fire problems and leaks fuel,” said Atlanta-based businessman Bobby Burns, a project manager who takes more than 50 trips a year.

“I think of it the same as a new car model: Wait a year or two to get all the ‘recalls’ sorted out.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • arlene692

    like Shawn responded I'm in shock that a person able to profit $5473 in a few weeks on the internet. did you read this web page jump15.comCHECK IT OUT

  • ScottyBoy

    I'm not flying on anything made of "composite materials". I like my planes to be made from as many solid pieces as possible.

  • kafantaris

    Boeing makes solid planes and has been doing so for decades. Yet despite their wide use, large lithium batteries still lag in safety.
    Ironically a safer route for Boeing would have been to use hydrogen batteries. Not only would hydrogen have given the 787 safer, lighter, and longer lasting batteries (weeks on end), but they could have been recharged in minutes every time the plane refueled.
    In any event, we should intelligently work through the 787’s battery problem. Either we better isolate the present lithium batteries or we replace them altogether. And as soon as we are done, the planes should get back on the air because they are otherwise sound — and safe.