Panetta Opens Quarter-Million Combat Jobs to Women

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The U.S. military is ending its policy of excluding women from combat and will open combat jobs and direct combat units to female troops, multiple officials told CNN on Wednesday.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will make the announcement Thursday and notify Congress of the planned change in policy, the officials said.

“We will eliminate the policy of ‘no women in units that are tasked with direct combat,'” a senior defense official said.

The officials cautioned, however, that “not every position will open all at once on Thursday.” Once the policy is changed, the Department of Defense will enter what is being called an “assessment phase,” in which each branch of service will examine all its jobs and units not currently integrated and then produce a timetable for integrating them.

The Army and Marine Corps, especially, will be examining physical standards and gender-neutral accommodations within combat units. Every 90 days, the service chiefs will have to report on their progress.

The move will be one of the last significant policy decisions made by Panetta, who is expected to leave in mid-February. It is not clear where former Sen. Chuck Hagel, the nominated replacement, stands, but officials say he has been apprised of Panetta’s coming announcement.

“It will take a while to work out the mechanics in some cases. We expect some jobs to open quickly, by the end of this year. Others, like special operations forces and infantry, may take longer,” a senior defense official explained. Panetta is setting the goal of January 2016 for all assessments to be complete and women to be integrated as much as possible.

The Pentagon has left itself some wiggle room, however, which may ultimately lead to some jobs being designated as closed to women. A senior defense official said if, after the assessment, a branch finds that “a specific job or unit should not be open, they can go back to the secretary and ask for an exemption to the policy, to designate the job or unit as closed.”

The official said the goal remains to open as many jobs as possible. “We should open all specialties to the maximum extent possible to women. We know they can do it.”

Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican who spent six years as a prisoner of war during the Vietnam War, said he supports lifting the ban on women serving in combat, pointing out women are already serving in harm’s way. But he said the move should not fundamentally change the military.

“As this new rule is implemented, it is critical that we maintain the same high standards that have made the American military the most feared and admired fighting force in the world – particularly the rigorous physical standards for our elite special forces units,” McCain said in a statement.

Thousands of women in the military have already found themselves in combat situations, said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington. Recent wars such as Iraq and Afghanistan have lacked a real front line, and women serving there have come under fire and had to fight back alongside male counterparts, she said.

Murray, who leads the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee and is a member of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, called Panetta’s decision a “historic step for equality” that recognizes the role women play in the military.

The Pentagon must notify Congress of each job or unit as it is sent up to the secretary to be opened to women. Then the Defense Department must wait 30 days while Congress is in session before implementing the change.

It is a marked difference from the way the military ended the exclusion of gays serving openly, or the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. In that case, there were no stipulations attached to openly gay service members. There was no staggered approach that integrated openly gay troops into units. It was instead done all at once, across the board.

A senior defense official explained the Pentagon’s reasoning behind the different approach: “You’re talking about personal choice of behavior versus physical capability. And they were already in the units. If you take a unit that’s never had women before, that’s quite a culture change.”

Another senior defense official said the goal is “to provide a level, gender-neutral playing field.”

The American Civil Liberties Union recently filed a federal lawsuit against the Department of Defense, charging that combat exclusion is unfair and outdated, harms America’s safety and prevents women from receiving training and recognition for their work. The plaintiffs, who include women awarded Purple Hearts, say the exclusion places them at a disadvantage for promotion.

The ACLU said it is thrilled about Panetta’s planned announcement.

“But we welcome this statement with cautious optimism, as we hope that it will be implemented fairly and quickly so that servicewomen can receive the same recognition for their service as their male counterparts,” Ariela Migdal, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Women’s Rights Project, said in the statement.

Earlier this month, the Army opened the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment to women, and it has begun recruiting female pilots and crew chiefs. The Navy has put its first female officers on submarines in the past year, and certain female ground troops have been attached to combat units in Iraq and Afghanistan. More than 800 women were wounded in those wars, and at least 130 have died.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

23 comments

  • HummingBull

    Women in combat.

    My only issue is most women cannot carry a man.

    If I got hit and could not move to safety another man could carry me, most women could not.

    This is the defining issue. I don't care what plumbing a soldier/marine has… BUT if they cannot transport a 180 pound human 50 yards, they have no business on the front lines.

    Period end.

  • HummingBull

    Re-reading this…

    1.) ANYONE serving on the front in ANY capacity should get haz pay.

    2.) Since when is opportunity even a consideration? This is not about careers? This is not about politics. This is about getting the job done. Again… The litmus test should be simple. Can you fireman carry a 180 pound dude fifty yards?

    3.) What the hell does Loretta Sanchez know about combat? She is a moron on her best day.

  • malclave

    Are women going to be subject to the same standards as men for Combat Arms jobs, or will they get easier standards like with the PT tests?

    I had a medical MOS when I was in, so it wasn't a big deal. But if women get a lower standard, will they be able to pull their weight humping all that gear in an infantry job? Maybe we can give them lighter body armor and ask the enemy to use smaller bullets when shooting at them… I'm sure they'd oblige.

  • cheeseburger

    I don't know what side to choose on this, but I have female friends that got sweet talked by the recruiters to join some branch of the military. After everything was done boot camp etc. they were usually given a desk job or something like that. And some of them were not happy, they thought they were going to do action packed stuff, whatever it is they meant by that.

  • PublicNME

    I think they would be a distraction and get soldiers killed trying to hold their hand and keeping them from falling behind, they just don't have the upper body strength needed in combat.

  • Rogue1

    'Good order and discipline' sacrificed to political correctness. Not everyone attached to, or serving in, an infantry battalion or in a combat arms MOS is automatically awarded combat decorations now just because the shooting starts. So that argument is suspect.

  • mark

    well at least now you can get some p***y while out in the BUSH !!!!……better hope if your in a trench,you don't get a lesbo!….LMAO!

  • bsad549

    my co-worker's half-sister makes $63 every hour on the internet. She has been unemployed for nine months but last month her income was $21665 just working on the internet for a few hours. Here's the site to read more http://xurl.es/ptw7j

  • wtsup697

    until I saw the paycheck ov $6738, I have faith …that…my neighbour was like actually receiving money in there spare time at their laptop.. there friend brother has been doing this less than seven months and just now cleard the depts on there home and bourt a great Mercedes. read more at, http://xurl.es/pon1p

  • Jobs for women

    Hi,
    Great info. I like all your post. I will keep visiting this blog very often. It is good to see you verbalize from the heart and your clarity on this important subject can be easily observed.