O.C. Salon Massacre: Defense To Get Jailhouse Informant Documents

SEAL BEACH, Calif. (KTLA) — Prosecutors were ordered to turn over all information about a jailhouse informant during a pretrial hearing Friday for the man accused of murdering eight people in a Seal Beach salon.

Scott Dekraai, 44, is charged with eight counts of murder in the midday massacre at Salon Meritage on October 12, 2011.

The hearing addressed prosecutors’ plans to play audio recordings from some of the hundreds of hours of conversations between Dekraai and a jailhouse informant.

The recordings were made covertly by law enforcement a week after Dekraai was arrested, and reportedly include several instances of him talking about the shootings.

The defense filed a motion seeking more information about the informant and whether he enticed Dekraai into talking.

If the conversations were pre-arranged, the defense says, it could be a violation of Dekraai’s right to legal representation because they happened after he had an attorney.

Prosecutors maintain that Dekraai made the comments without any prompting or quizzing by the informant.

Dekraai was indicted in January 2012 and has pleaded not guilty. He could face the death penalty if he’s convicted.

Among the victims in the salon shooting was Dekraai’s ex-wife, stylist Michelle Fournier, 47, with whom he was involved in a bitter custody dispute.

Also killed inside the salon were Christy Lynn Wilson, 47; salon owner Randy Fannin, 61; Victoria Ann Buzzo, 54; Lucia Bernice Kondas, 65; Laura Lee Webb Elody, 46; and Michele Fast.

David Caouette, 64, was shot and killed while sitting in his vehicle in the parking lot as Dekraai was fleeing, police said.

Dekraai was arrested by a Seal Beach officer as he drove away from the salon. He told the officer, “I know what I did,” according to a search warrant affidavit.

He also confessed to detectives during an interview, according to the affidavit, calling the people he shot after his wife “collateral damage.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

9 comments

  • YouArgue.com

    Preempting the "see this is why guns should be banned" crowd before they start spouting off comments. Only a small minority of people use these devices in an irresponsible manner. Everyone else's rights should not be taken away because of this. Otherwise you could make a similar argument for driving cars, since many people misuse them. The difference of course is that gun ownership is a constitutional right and driving is a privilege. http://www.youargue.com/index.php/discussions/bro

    • Sam

      Tee Hee, where's our friend Mark the Troll now spouting off about how you don't ever see white people doing bad things in the news?

  • rjulia142

    just before I saw the draft for $8524, I be certain …that…my mom in-law was like actualy making money in their spare time from there new laptop.. there great aunt has done this 4 less than twenty months and as of now cleard the loans on their house and bourt a great Volkswagen Golf GTI. I went here, http://xurl.es/wj5rq

  • joey

    Guns are bad in any way, shape, or form. The solution to all gun related crimes is to take all the guns from people period. Second amendment is your constitutional right? Ask me if I care about it. Oh, I forgot gang members, who have one their time and free now are part of the second amendment and can have guns. Oh God forbids you violate gang members's right to the second amendment.


Related Stories