AQMD: Wildomar Soil Samples Show No Contamination

WILDOMAR, Calif. (KTLA) — There are exclusive new developments in claims of contamination in a Riverside county neighborhood.

Residents in a Wildomar community believe their homes are making them sick, but now new test results appear to contradict their claims.

South Coast Air Quality Management invited KTLA to its lab, where it analyzed air and soil samples collected from three homes in the Autumnwood development.

“We hope it’s reassuring that what we found is n different than what we would find in any other subdivision in Southern California,” said AQMD spokesman Sam Atwood.

The results may be reassuring for some property owners, but Xonia Villanueva, who abandoned her home on Amaryllis Court for health reasons, says he isn’t buying it.

“I don’t think their testing is adequate,” she told KTLA.

Villanueva is among 60 people in the Wildomar neighborhood who claim chemical vapors from the soil under their homes is making them sick.

“What was done here is grab samples,” she said. “Grab samples are instantaneous samples that are taken for about 20 to 30 seconds of air.”

“That would be like living in your home and only taking a gasp of air. We’re living in our homes 24 hours a day.”

“We did collect samples over a very short period with so-called ‘grab samples,’ but we also went back and collected them over a period of several hours,” Atwood noted.

“In fact, the two results were very, very similar, so this tells us that our methods were sound,” he said.

Still, Villanueva claims that tests done by a law firm representing her and other homeowners prove there is a hazardous mixture of volatile compounds in the soil.

Villanueva says that supports a claim that neighbor Fatima Chicarrelli died from prolonged exposure.

An autopsy reveled elevated levels of barium in Chicarrelli’s body, but where it came from is still a mystery.

The law firm has yet to test to confirm that her exposure came from the soil.

AQMD says the levels just aren’t there.

“We found that barium was well within the typical range you’d see in soils in this part of the country,” Atwood said.

“We can say that the homes that we tested — the three homes — should not have any concerns for the air indoors or outdoors or from the soil in their yards,” he insisted.

“This is not going to quiet us,” Villanueva maintained. “We are not done, by far. There is something there. DTSC needs to step up to the plate. They need to do their job.”

 

4 comments

  • Alan Follis

    Its funny since AQMD and EMWD have direct contracts with Riverside county for developmental and commercially run projects. It wouldnt be in their best interest to do the correct type of testing. I would perform test on a 3 ft by 3 ft, 4 ft deep section of soil on the home of the deceased, as well as those that stated they have been affected. Whatever, if anything, is not going to be at the top 8 inches of soil. It may also be something that is chemicallly reactive in nature, like water into Hydrofluoric Acid. It creates gases and reacts violently (just a scenario). You can also perform air monitoting with an SLR-7 and use different cartridges that the manufacturer carries. I have used this in the past testing for one chemical, and turning up something completely different.

  • Barclay

    s neighbour done this for 10-months and actually earnt over $6072 parttime at There laptop. apply the steps from this site… FLY38. ℂom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s