California Lawmakers Question Whether Burden of Proof for Sexual Harassment Victims Is Too High

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Is it too difficult for victims of sexual harassment to make their case in court? California legislators wrestled with that question Thursday at a hearing examining the legal threshold for harassment cases under state and federal law.

California State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson attends The Dinner For Equality co-hosted by Patricia Arquette and Marc Benioff on Feb. 25, 2016, in Beverly Hills. (Credit: Mike Windle / Getty Images)

California State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson attends The Dinner For Equality co-hosted by Patricia Arquette and Marc Benioff on Feb. 25, 2016, in Beverly Hills. (Credit: Mike Windle / Getty Images)

Prompted by the high rate of sexual harassment cases dismissed by judges, lawmakers focused on the standard that victims must prove harassment was “severe or pervasive” in cases alleging a hostile workplace.

“It’s important because all efforts to enforce emanate from the legal standard that exists,” said state Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), who chaired the panel.

Witnesses presented a mixed assessment of the threshold, which relies on a judge’s interpretation of whether a person endured behavior that was “severe or pervasive” enough to materially alter that person’s workplace experience.

Read the full story on LATimes.com.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.