San Diego Judge Orders Attorney Access for Migrants Who Fear Return Under the Remain in Mexico Program

Migrants, mostly from Mexico, sit on the ground as they wait near the Paso del Norte Bridge at the Mexico-U.S. border in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on Sept. 12, 2019. (Credit: Paul Ratje / AFP / Getty Images)

Migrants, mostly from Mexico, sit on the ground as they wait near the Paso del Norte Bridge at the Mexico-U.S. border in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on Sept. 12, 2019. (Credit: Paul Ratje / AFP / Getty Images)

A San Diego federal judge in a pair of decisions Tuesday ruled that asylum seekers who have expressed fear about being returned to Mexico to await their U.S. immigration proceedings must be allowed access to attorneys to argue their cases.

The rulings center on a crucial interview process that determines whether such asylum seekers should be part of the Trump administration’s so-called Remain in Mexico program, or whether the likelihood of persecution or torture south of the border means they should remain in the U.S. for the duration of their immigration cases.

A Guatemalan family who filed the federal lawsuit complained that they were not allowed adequate access to attorneys before or during the interview with the asylum officer — a process called a “non-refoulement interview.” The family — a couple and their five children — had been assaulted at gunpoint during their trek through Mexico.

In November, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw ordered border authorities to grant the family access to attorneys. The family has since been allowed to stay temporarily in the U.S.

Read the full story on LATimes.com.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.