Federal Judge Blocks Parts of Travel Ban Limiting U.S. Entry to Refugees from Multiple Muslim-Majority Countries

Nation/World
This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

A federal judge in Washington state has blocked parts of the Trump administration’s travel ban that limits entry into the United States by refugees from several majority Muslim nations.

In a ruling released Saturday, Judge James Robart of the Western District of Washington agreed with two groups that argued the travel ban prevents some foreign nationals from reuniting with family members already in the United States.

John Wider carries a welcome sign near arriving international travelers on the first day of the the partial reinstatement of the Trump travel ban, temporarily barring travelers from six Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S., at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) on June 29, 2017, in Los Angeles. (Credit: David McNew/Getty Images)
John Wider carries a welcome sign near arriving international travelers on the first day of the the partial reinstatement of the Trump travel ban, temporarily barring travelers from six Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S., at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) on June 29, 2017, in Los Angeles. (Credit: David McNew/Getty Images)

“We are thrilled that families will have the chance to be reunited and refugees who have suffered so much will have the chance to make it to safety,” Rabbi Will Berkovitz, the chief executive officer of the Jewish Family Service of Seattle, which brought one of the suits, said. “As we celebrate this moment, we remember our ancestors who did not have anyone standing with them or for them.”

Several of the refugees involved in the Jewish Family Service case are from Iraq while another is from Egypt and one is from Somalia.

In the other case, the American Civil Liberties Union represented a man who is a Somali citizen and his family.

The plaintiffs argued that a memo that accompanied the latest travel ban includes directives to prevent the entry of refugees who are citizens of 11 countries. Government lawyers declined in court to name the nations, the judge wrote, but said they posed elevated risks to national security.

Members of a coalition of immigration lawyers wait for people affected by U.S. President Donald Trump's temporary ban on incoming refugees and travelers from seven Muslim countries, at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) in Los Angeles on Jan. 30, 2017. (Credit: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images)
Members of a coalition of immigration lawyers wait for people affected by U.S. President Donald Trump’s temporary ban on incoming refugees and travelers from seven Muslim countries, at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) in Los Angeles on Jan. 30, 2017. (Credit: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images)

Eight of the nations were named in President Donald Trump’s executive order on October 24 implementing the third version of the ban. They are Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Somalia and Yemen.

There were two motions, one for people from the 11 countries that were included in the memo and other foreigners classified as “following-to-join” refugees.

The judge granted the motions, but said his ruling does not apply to “those refugees who lack a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”

The ruling comes one day after the three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the latest version of the travel ban violates federal law.

The travel ban itself, however, remains in effect. The Supreme Court issued an order this month saying the ban can be enforced while challenges to the policy make their way through the legal system.

Trademark and Copyright 2020 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

Most Popular

Latest News

More News

KTLA on Instagram

Instagram

KTLA on Facebook

KTLA on Twitter